?Are your crypto assets really protected when you leave them on an exchange, and how can you tell which platforms actually carry meaningful insurance?
Which Crypto Exchanges Have Insurance For User Assets?
This article walks you through how insurance for user assets on crypto exchanges actually works, which major exchanges advertise insurance, and how to evaluate those claims so you can make informed custody decisions. You’ll get practical checklists, a comparison table, and concrete steps to protect your holdings.
Why insurance matters — and why it isn’t always what it seems
Insurance sounds comforting, but in crypto it often comes with important caveats. You’ll want to know what is covered, who underwrites the policy, where your assets are stored (hot vs cold wallets), and what exclusions apply. Insurance can mitigate some risks, but it rarely covers all the ways you can lose funds.
How crypto exchange insurance is typically structured
Insurance for exchanges tends to be layered and limited rather than a blanket guarantee. Most policies focus on specific risks such as theft from a platform’s hot wallets, employee theft, or fraudulent transfers, while excluding things like platform insolvency or losses caused by your account compromise.
You should understand the typical building blocks of exchange insurance before trusting a platform with significant funds.
Hot wallet vs cold storage coverage
Hot wallets are online systems used to process withdrawals and trades; they are the most frequent target of hacks. Cold storage is offline custody of private keys and is generally much less exposed to online attack.
Exchanges may insure hot wallet funds to address hacking risks while leaving cold storage uninsured because the risk profile is different and easier to manage offline. Always confirm which wallets the policy covers.
Custodial insurance vs bank/fiat protections
Fiat balances you hold on an exchange may be held at partner banks. Those bank deposits can be FDIC-insured up to applicable limits in the U.S. (typically per-customer, per-bank limits), but that insurance applies to the bank account, not to crypto and not if the exchange fails to segregate client funds properly.
Crypto insurance is usually provided by commercial insurers (or syndicates like Lloyd’s), and it’s distinct from bank deposit insurance. You should verify both custodial crypto coverage and the treatment of fiat if you hold USD, EUR or other fiat currencies.
Proof-of-reserves and third-party audits
Proof-of-reserves is a transparency mechanism where an exchange cryptographically demonstrates it holds assets corresponding to customer balances. Independent audits and SOC reports add another layer of verification. Neither is insurance, but they tell you how much of your asset claims are actually backed.
You should look for regular, independent proof-of-reserves, public audit reports, and SOC 2 or equivalent compliance when evaluating platforms.

Summary comparison: Popular exchanges and their insurance posture
This table gives a snapshot of well-known exchanges, the typical scope of their insurance (as of mid-2024 reporting and common industry practices), and other relevant notes you should check before trusting your assets. Policies and arrangements may change, so always verify current details on the exchange’s website.
| Exchange | Typical Insurance Coverage (common claims) | Insurer / Provider (examples) | Fiat deposit protection | Transparency & audits | Reputation notes (2025 outlook) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase | Insurance for custodial hot wallets against security breaches; cold storage often held in offline vaults (not always insured) | Commercial insurers; Coinbase has historically disclosed insurance arrangements | USD custodial cash often held at FDIC-insured banks (check limits) | Regular transparency reports, proof-of-reserves efforts, SOC 2 | Strong US regulatory posture; widely trusted by institutions |
| Kraken | Crime and theft coverage for exchange-held assets (hot wallet coverage varies) | Policies via global insurers; uses institutional custody options | Fiat often held with partner banks (check jurisdictional protections) | Public proof-of-reserves, audits for certain business lines | Long-standing reputation for security and compliance |
| Gemini | Hot wallet insurance policies (often named), institutional custody services (Gemini Custody) | Historically worked with large insurers; uses custody solutions | USD segregated and often held in partner banks, FDIC protection for certain balances | Proof-of-reserves and periodic reporting | Focus on regulation and compliance; strong brand trust in US |
| Bitstamp | Insurance for assets in custody (varies by wallet) and third-party custody partnerships | Insurance market placements (e.g., Lloyd’s panels reported historically) | Fiat held in client accounts with bank protections depending on region | Regular reporting and long operational history | Reputation for longevity and conservative operations |
| Binance / Binance.US | Varies by entity; some hot wallet insurance and SAFU reserve for protection | Binance maintains an emergency fund (SAFU); third-party policies may be used | Fiat deposit protection depends on banking partners and jurisdiction | Increased transparency since regulatory scrutiny; proof-of-reserves occasional | Mixed reputation: large liquidity but regulatory challenges in some jurisdictions |
| Crypto.com | Insurance for online hot wallets (subject to policy limits) | Commercial insurers and custody partners (historically) | Fiat bank deposit protections vary by region | Periodic audits and proof-of-reserves claims | Rebuilding trust after past incidents; check current policies |
| Bitfinex | Some policies for hot wallet theft and crime; relies on cold storage for bulk holdings | Commercial insurers and custodian partners | Fiat protections per banking arrangements | Less frequent public audits; has compensated customers after incidents in past | Experienced exchange with history of recovering from crises |
| Bybit, OKX, Huobi | Insurance or reserve funds used selectively; coverage varies | Mix of internal reserve funds and external policies | Fiat protections variable and jurisdiction-dependent | Varies across exchanges; proof-of-reserves less consistent | Strong market presence but regulatory signals vary by jurisdiction |
Notes: This table gives a high-level view. Insurance coverage, providers, and limits change frequently. You must read the exchange’s insurance policy and terms of service before relying on coverage.
Deep dive: What each major exchange commonly states about insurance
This section outlines the typical positions of the named exchanges. You should treat specifics as a starting point and verify current documents.
Coinbase
Coinbase often highlights insurance for a portion of customer crypto stored online (hot wallet coverage) and uses offline cold storage for most assets. The company has historically maintained commercial crime insurance and published transparency reports. For your fiat, Coinbase usually places USD deposits with FDIC-insured banks in the U.S., but FDIC protection applies to the bank cash accounts, not to crypto.
You should read Coinbase’s insurance disclosures carefully to understand exclusions and limits, and note that insurance typically does not protect you from account-level compromises like phishing or social engineering if credentials are stolen.
Kraken
Kraken emphasizes security and has stated it carries insurance policies addressing certain criminal acts and breaches. Kraken also provides institutional custody where additional protections may apply. They have taken steps such as proof-of-reserves and third-party audits in the past.
You should confirm which wallets and which risks the policy covers, and whether your specific assets would fall under insured categories.
Gemini
Gemini positions itself as a regulated custodian with insurance coverage for digital assets held online. Gemini Custody has offered additional institutional coverage and insurance arrangements historically. Fiat holdings are typically segregated and often held at partner banks.
You should be aware that insurance often excludes losses caused by your own account compromise and may not protect against insolvency.
Bitstamp
Bitstamp has a long track record and reports using custodial insurance and third-party custodians. The exchange emphasizes cold storage for the majority of assets and has used commercial insurance placements historically.
You should verify current policy wording for hot wallet coverage and exclusions.
Binance / Binance.US
Binance historically used an internal emergency fund (SAFU) and has arranged insurance coverage for selective risks. Regulatory pressure since 2021–2024 led to increased scrutiny and transparency efforts. Binance.US offers different protections relative to Binance global, depending on local regulations and bank partners.
You should be cautious: regulatory issues can change an exchange’s risk profile quickly. Confirm the exact legal entity you’re using and its stated protections.
Crypto.com
Crypto.com has indicated that it holds most assets in cold storage and maintains insurance for some online assets. It has faced reputational challenges in the past but has also made public claims about coverage and custody best practices.
You should check whether the exchange’s insurance applies to your account type and whether the policy is current and adequate.
Bitfinex, Bybit, OKX, Huobi
These exchanges often use a mix of internal reserves, hot wallet insurance, and custodial partnerships. The scope varies widely by entity and jurisdiction.
You should research the specific entity you intend to use, read the policy documents, and verify how quickly and reliably they have compensated customers in past incidents.

What insurance typically covers — and what it usually doesn’t
This section explains standard inclusions and frequent exclusions so you can set realistic expectations. Policies differ, but patterns repeat across many providers.
Common inclusions
- Theft resulting from security breaches of the exchange’s systems (where the exchange is at fault).
- Employee theft or internal fraud by exchange staff under some policies.
- Some policies cover specific hot wallet losses and may include reimbursement limits per incident.
You should verify the defined triggers for a claim and the proof required by the insurer.
Common exclusions
- Losses due to user negligence, such as stolen passwords, SIM-swapping, phishing, or compromised 2FA.
- Losses caused by exchange insolvency or bankruptcy in many policies, unless a very specific bankruptcy insurance product exists.
- Losses during unauthorized transfers that are contested if the exchange’s controls are deemed adequate.
- Losses of assets held in cold storage when cold storage is intentionally excluded from the policy.
- Losses from regulatory seizures or frozen assets in some situations.
You should never assume blanket protection; read exclusions carefully.
How to evaluate an exchange’s insurance claim — a checklist
Use this practical checklist to assess whether the insurance you’re being promised actually protects your holdings in realistic scenarios.
- Read the full policy wording: Don’t rely on marketing summaries. You should inspect the insurer name, policy number, effective dates, and exact coverage language.
- Identify the insurer and check solvency: Major insurers and Lloyd’s syndicates are preferable because they have reputations and capacity to pay.
- Confirm per-incident and aggregate limits: A policy might say “up to $X,” but that could be shared across all customers or subject to a maximum per incident.
- Check covered wallet types: Verify whether hot wallets, cold storage, staking accounts, or custodial institutional accounts are covered.
- Review exclusions: Look specifically for exclusions around social engineering, internal insolvency, and regulatory action.
- Look for proof-of-reserves and audit reports: Independent audits and proof-of-reserves enhance trust beyond insurance promises.
- Confirm jurisdiction and legal entity: Your legal protections depend on the entity you contract with — Binance.com vs Binance.US are different.
- Check dispute and claim procedures: Understand how claims are handled, timelines, and documentation required.
- See historical responses: How did the exchange act in prior incidents? Speed and fairness of customer compensation in the past matter.
- Consider counterparty risk: If the insurer is obscure or the policy is reinsured in layers with weak reinsurers, that increases risk.
You should treat this list as a minimum due diligence routine before storing large amounts on an exchange.

Practical recommendations for holding crypto in 2025
Whether you hold a little or a lot, your custody strategy should match your risk tolerance and the size of your holdings. Use these rules of thumb.
Small to medium holdings (everyday use)
If you keep limited funds for trading or payments, leaving them on an exchange with clear insurance for hot wallets and strong security practices may be acceptable. You should enable hardware-based 2FA (FIDO2/Passkeys), set withdrawal whitelist rules where available, and keep only what you need on exchanges.
You should treat exchange-stored crypto as convenience funds, not long-term savings.
Large holdings (long-term storage)
For substantial amounts, consider self-custody in hardware wallets or institutional custodians with segregated custody, multi-signature setups, or regulated custody services. Insurance for these arrangements is often different and sometimes available at the institutional level.
You should reduce counterparty risk by keeping the majority of holdings in self-custody or trusted regulated custodians.
Institutional or very large holdings
Use regulated custodians, professional-grade custody solutions (multi-jurisdictional custody, segregated accounts, nested insurance), and legal agreements that specify recourse and recovery procedures. You should seek custodians with strong audit histories and high-limit insurance policies from reputable insurers.
You should involve legal and compliance advisors for institutional custody planning.
Steps you should take right now to reduce custody risk
Implement practical steps that don’t require you to become an expert insurer.
- Use hardware wallets for long-term holdings and offline cold storage for significant portions of your assets.
- Activate a hardware security key (U2F/FIDO2) for exchange logins and withdrawals where supported.
- Whitelist withdrawal addresses on exchanges that offer this feature.
- Keep trading balances small and withdraw profits or unused funds to cold storage.
- Use multi-factor authentication and avoid SMS-only 2FA.
- Maintain up-to-date recovery procedures for your hardware wallets and test seed phrase backups in a safe manner.
- Maintain records: screenshots of exchange policy pages, policy numbers, and any communications about insurance for your records.
- Rebalance custody: If you use multiple exchanges, diversify risk across regulated entities and custodial products.
You should treat security as layered — insurance is only one layer.

Frequently asked questions you’ll likely have
You’ll have practical questions about what insurance means in everyday terms. These answers help you interpret claims.
Does FDIC or SIPC protect my crypto?
No — FDIC protects bank deposits at FDIC-member banks up to limits and SIPC protects certain brokerage securities, but neither directly covers crypto as an asset class. If an exchange holds your fiat in a bank account, that cash might be FDIC-insured per specific rules, but your crypto holdings are not covered by FDIC or SIPC in most cases.
You should always verify how your fiat is held and whether it benefits from bank insurance.
If an exchange gets hacked, will I get my money back?
Possibly — if the hack falls within the policy’s covered risks and the insurer pays. Many exchanges may have limited funds or complex claims processes that can delay reimbursement. Some exchanges have arranged industry funds or self-insurance structures, but payouts vary.
You should plan on delayed or partial recovery unless you have strong evidence of comprehensive coverage.
Is self-custody always safer than exchange custody?
Self-custody removes counterparty risk but increases your responsibility. If you lose a private key and have no backup, funds are irretrievable. Exchanges introduce counterparty and operational risk but may offer convenience and liquidity.
You should balance convenience and security according to how much you hold.
Are decentralized exchanges insured?
Usually not. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are smart contracts; they typically don’t have insurance against smart contract bugs or platform vulnerabilities. Some protocols offer bug-bounty programs or developer-run insurance funds, but these are not equivalent to commercial insurance.
You should be cautious with DEXs and understand smart contract risk.
Scenario planning: what to do if something goes wrong
If you suspect a compromise or see unexpected activity, follow these steps quickly.
- Freeze or restrict: Use any emergency freeze or withdrawal lock features provided by the exchange if available.
- Contact support: File a support ticket immediately and escalate if necessary with “security” or “legal” tracks.
- Preserve evidence: Save transaction IDs, screenshots, and relevant logs.
- Notify: For large events, notify your banking partners and legal counsel. In some regions, regulators or law enforcement may be appropriate.
- Public channels: Monitor official exchange channels (verified Twitter/X, status pages) to confirm whether the issue is widespread.
- Claim preparation: Gather KYC details, account logs, and policy references if you plan to make an insurance claim.
You should act fast and document everything carefully.

How the regulatory environment in 2025 affects insurance claims
Regulatory clarity and enforcement across jurisdictions have increased since earlier industry crises. Exchanges operating under clear regulation generally provide more robust custody practices and may have better access to insurance markets.
You should check whether the entity is regulated in your jurisdiction and whether regulation requires certain custody or insurance practices. Regulatory pressure tends to improve consumer protections, but it also can lead to abrupt changes in service availability.
Final thoughts: balancing convenience, security and peace of mind
Insurance on exchanges can reduce certain kinds of risk, but it is rarely a full replacement for prudent custody practices. You should use insurance as one factor in your overall strategy: confirm policy details, limit exposure on exchanges, and use self-custody for assets you cannot afford to lose.
You should aim for a custody approach that reflects how you use crypto: trading balances stay on reputable exchanges with clear protections and small amounts for daily use, while the bulk of long-term holdings goes into secure, tested self-custody or regulated institutional custody.
Quick reference checklist before you put significant assets on any exchange
- Read the insurance policy (full text).
- Identify insurer(s) and policy numbers.
- Confirm coverage amounts and per-incident caps.
- Check covered wallet types (hot vs cold).
- Verify exclusions (social engineering, insolvency, regulatory seizure).
- Confirm fiat deposit protections (FDIC or local bank protections).
- Review proof-of-reserves and audit history.
- Verify legal entity and jurisdiction.
- Enable hardware 2FA and withdrawal whitelists.
- Consider splitting holdings: trading on exchange + long-term self-custody.
You should use this checklist as your minimum due diligence for custody decisions.
If you want, I can produce a personalized comparison table for the specific exchanges you use, summarizing their current insurance statements and links to the primary policy documents so you can review them directly.
